Talk:Parbold

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Commuting

The section on the railway says "and commute to nearby towns such as Wigan, Ormskirk, and Preston". Wigan is clearly a commutor destination, and especially before the curves at Burscough Bridge were lost so was Ormskirk I suppose, but are Southport and Manchester (with direct connections) not more likely destinations? Is there any reason for picking these three towns?--NHSavage 20:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Village or small town?

Surely the references to Parbold as a 'small village' are out of date? Today Parbold is a small dormitory town. It has two churches, two primary schools, a library, a purpose-built community hall, a telephone exchange, and a bank, in addition to those facilities already mentioned. Yozzer66 21:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it depends on your definition of a town. Traditionally of course it was somewhere with a market which to the best of my knowlege it has never had. I would agree it is not a small village but with a population of less than 4,000 and without any large shops it isn't really a town. It doesn't have a large supermarket, any major chain stores or a secondary school. OK it has a bank but I wouldn't use that as a definition. When would you sy it stopped being a vilage? The bank has been there for decades (possibly a century!), similarly the churches and it had at least one school since the Victorian era as well. --NHSavage 10:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have researched and thought about this some more. Firstly I have never heard of Parbold referred to as a town (and I lived there for 16 years, my parents still live there). Secondly, the wikipedia page on Town states: "In modern usage the term town is used either for old market towns, or for settlements which have a Town Council." Neithter is true of Parbold. I have therefore changed the page to reflect this. However as its population is bigger than that of Exeter in 1400 [1] I have changed it from small to large town. size is very relative!--NHSavage 21:02, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Parbold is a Village and can not be considered a Town.

Distances to watch pro football

The distances quoted are 'as the crow flies'. It may be significantly longer by train or car. Yozzer66 11:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

This article is still in dire need of appropriate citations. If you can help, please do so. Don't worry about getting the formating right. I can always amend it later. Thanks. Yozzer66 (talk) 23:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Parbold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110613191201/http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/libraries/librarydetails/libhist.asp?name=Parbold to http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/libraries/librarydetails/libhist.asp?name=Parbold
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214173022/http://www.skemboundaryharriers.co.uk/html/parbold_hill.html to http://www.skemboundaryharriers.co.uk/html/parbold_hill.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080418104323/http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/libraries/librarydetails/libsearch1.asp?name=Parbold to http://www.lancashire.gov.uk/libraries/librarydetails/libsearch1.asp?name=Parbold
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080128161845/http://www.parboldfc.co.uk/ to http://www.parboldfc.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]