A fact from Panta Rhei (film) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the film Panta Rhei is about the rhythms of clouds and water because the director Bert Haanstra did not feel ready to deal with people?
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:17, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
... that the film Panta Rhei is about the rhythms of clouds and water because the director Bert Haanstra did not feel ready to deal with people? Source: Documentary: A History of the Non-fiction Film ("In Panta Rhei ... he shows us the movement of clouds, speeded; then rushing water, slowed. As the one dissolves into the other, we sense a surprising identity between their rhythmic patterns. ... Haanstra began with such experiments because—as he later explained—he did not feel ready to cope with people.")
Overall: The article was new enough when it was first created. The length is more than adequate. Sourcing could have been a bit better. The synopsis is also sourced from the remainder and PhD thesis. I would have preferred template:sfn with page#s for the thesis given the size (and the thesis was split per chapter). Nevertheless, everything is sourced. It is interesting, however you might want to add a non-free image, because then it becomes clearer for those who don't know Haanstra.KittenKlub (talk) 21:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article was new enough when it was first created. The length is more than adequate. Sourcing could have been a bit better. The synopsis is also sourced from the remainder and PhD thesis. I would have preferred template:sfn with page#s for the thesis given the size (and the thesis was split per chapter). Nevertheless, everything is sourced. It is interesting, however you might want to add a non-free image, because then it becomes clearer for those who don't know Haanstra.KittenKlub (talk) 21:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)