Talk:One Nation Working Together rally

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attendance figures?[edit]

It is 2010 and it isn't possible to determine whether there are 10,000 or 200,000 people in a crowd? Who is kidding who here? -- 77.7.171.213 (talk) 10:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures tell the tale: http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1010/Restoring_Honor_vs_One_Nation.html?showall
—WWoods (talk) 22:22, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And just how can we ascertain if the photo of One Nation's event was taken at it's peak attendance? I mean, while it's true that their event could never compare to Beck's and MLK's attendance [...] We shouldn't be treating them unfairly. Recovering Obamunist (talk) 01:46, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The media put it in the tens of thousands, so I have edited to reflect that. BS24 (talk) 13:26, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

The supposed link to an official website, http://www.onenationworkingtogether.org, goes to an unrelated site. Jacob (talk) 16:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on One Nation Working Together rally. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]