Jump to content

Talk:Now That's What I Call Music! 67 (UK series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

If we can't speculate here, where can we speculate?

  • On an internet discussion forum ([1] should suffice). Or on your blog. Or in your house. Or in your head. But not in any place to do with an encyclopaedia. Kinitawowi 15:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't have a blog,house or a head
  • lolz

Track listing

[edit]

Is there anything remotely resembling a source anywhere for the full tracklisting of a compilation album that isn't due for release for another month?! Kinitawowi 11:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why's not Sophie Ellis-Bextor in this album?!

[edit]

I think it's a shame that Sophie Ellis-Bextor's second single "Me and My Imagination" is not included in the album Now 67, because it was a Massive Hit single on the UK Dance Charts, and it peaked at #23 on the UK Singles Chart, due to a technical fault of iTunes, so I don't know why she's not included on this compilation. Paul McCartney released a single called "Dance Tonight", and that single only peaked at #26 on the UK Singles Chart, and that's a lower position than #23 of "Me and My Imagination". I don't understand! Hope "Today The Sun's On Us" appears on the next Now compilation!!!

NOW 68 is ready for you predictions!

[edit]

and its such a shame that sophie among others didn't make it onto now 67, notibly kaiser chiefs, scissor sisters,killers,fratellis,hoosiers and cascada

79.67.252.86 16:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trivial Trivia

[edit]

The inlay booklet contains a mistake, stating that the Klaxons It's Not Over Yet is their second hit of the year. It is actually their third, after Golden Skans and Gravity's Rainbow.

To me this seems an odd statement. Particularly as it is unsourced. Gravity's Rainbow, according to its page, only reached #35 in the charts... does that make it a hit? I don't realy know how these things are defined, but I thought I'd note my feelings here to see how others feel. JiMternet 14:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Now 67.jpg

[edit]

Image:Now 67.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Now That's What I Call Music! 60 (UK series) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:45, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]