Jump to content

Talk:No. 75 Squadron RAAF/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk) 02:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Progression

[edit]
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

[edit]
  • one dab according to the tools, I'm not sure how to fix this one: [3];
  • ext links all work;
  • you might consider adding alt text, but it is not a GA requirement: [4]
  • I think I'll leave that as the status of alt text at the moment seems unsettled (I'll add it if the article goes to an ACR though)
  • no copyright issues: [5]

Criteria

[edit]
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  • in the Offensive operations section, "couldn't deploy..." (maybe remove the contraction - "could not deploy");
  • Fixed
  • "newly-established" per WP:HYPHEN "A hyphen is not used after a standard -ly adverb"
  • Fixed
  • "newly-developed" - as above;
  • Fixed
  • slightly inconsistent capitalisation: "the squadron's" and then "While the Squadron's";
  • Fixed (all now lower case)
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • No issues.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • No issues.
  • No issues.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  • No issues.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
  • Generally seems fine, but I think "File:Raaf 75sqn.jpg" might need source information if you want to take this article beyond GA.
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail: