Talk:Munstergeleen

	Netherlands portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
	This article is supported by Dutch municipalities task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

I have a question: on the Dutch language version of the Munstergeleen page, it says that Munstergeleen was a separate municipality between 1810 and 1982. I could find no verification of the 1810 date. Indeed, I have in my possession a commemorative tile that was meant to celebrate the years of Munstegeleen's status as a separate municipality, and it reads "Munstergeleen 1283 - 1981." I have not seen any verification of the 1283 date, either, beyond its appearance on that tile. Does anyone know a source for the starting year of Munstergeleen as a separate municipality (gemeente, in Dutch)? I can read Dutch, for the most part, so I can be pointed to a Dutch online source. I no longer live in Munstergeleen (or even in Europe) so it is difficult for me to go to the Town Hall to view documents there.

Thank you in advance for any help. DrJill-from-NH (talk) 17:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to thank the volunteer evaluators who have changed the rating of this article from "stub" status. I am unsure whether this article was not rated as "B" class because it did not have enough material or it had material deemed irrelevant. (I presume it did not fail the "no original research" or "citation" criteria because there are 36 in-line citations.) If it is due to a lack of material, I would be happy to add to the article if I could be pointed to additional sources of information on Munstergeleen (and I can read Dutch, for the most part). If it is due to the presence of irrelevant material, I would appreciate hearing what portion of the article is judged to be irrelevant.

Many thanks. DrJill-from-NH (talk) 22:30, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Munstergeleen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724165046/http://www.sint-pancratius.nl/pg008.html to http://www.sint-pancratius.nl/pg008.html
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.plaatsgids.nl/natuur-en-recreatie/munstergeleen/heemtuin
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110324021357/http://www.usagschinnen.eur.army.mil/sites/local/default.asp to http://www.usagschinnen.eur.army.mil/sites/local/default.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091011042215/http://www.munstergelaen.nl/vereniging.php?id=7 to http://www.munstergelaen.nl/vereniging.php?id=7

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]