Talk:Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics

Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 3, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mongols Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 04:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hoping to get to this within a few hours. This is my first time reviewing a sports-related article, so please bear with me! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 04:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think that should be all! Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns so that I can know when to reevaluate. Thanks, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 18:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work on the changes and thanks for the fast response! I am now happy to pass this article for GA status. Congrats! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 00:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio check

Earwig says good to go.

Files

All images are relevant, good quality and copyright-free:

File:Flag of Mongolia.svg: valid public domain rationale;
File:Putin attended the opening ceremony of 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics (3).jpg: CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Prose

Batmönkhiin Achbadrakh and Enkhtuul Ariunsanaa are both wikilinked a few times. Only their first mentions in the lead and body of the article need to be wikilinked.
In the infobox, unlink Batmönkhiin Achbadrakh in Flag bearer (closing).
"the nation had sent two cross-country skiers, which were" – change to "who were"
"The delegation's best finish in any event was 65th by" – I would include 65th of 95 here for added context to readers.
Unlink the second mentions of opening ceremony and closing ceremony in Background.
Could Cross-country skiing be expanded upon at all? For instance, possibly how they were selected?
I would remove the first table (with the athletes) as unnecessary.

Done except for "Could Cross-country skiing be expanded upon at all". I think it's fine and doesn't need expansion as the information is consistent with Mongolia at the 2018 Winter Olympics, 2010, and 2006, which are all GA.

Ah, I see!

Refs

All sources used are RS. Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 1, 5, 8, 10, 13 or 17.

Find better publication names for the refs with urls (like www.olympics.com/).
I would remove the location parameter from ref 2 as this is the only such ciation.

Done I think, although I'm not quite sure what you mean by "Find better publication names"?

Using names instead of URLs, like www.olympics.com > olympics.com or www.fis-ski.com > International Ski Federation etc.

I see what you mean, I'll go do that, do you want me to wikilink them as well?

That is up to the article writer, but you have already wikilinked the refs for the International Olympic Committee, The Independent and Olympic Council of Asia so I would say yes. Also just noticed ref 10 is formatted "International Olympic Committee (IOC)". Using or not using the abbreviation are both acceptable but make them all consistent :)

Done I think I fixed all the refs.

@LunaEatsTuna: Pinging LunaEatsTuna.

Other

Navs, cats and most other templates good.

Move the short description to the very top of the article
Recommend adding template:Use X English
Please add WP:ALT text where possible

Done MasterMatt12^{💬 ● 📝} 23:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BorgQueen (talk) 08:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics marked the fifth straight Winter Olympics that they sent two cross-country skiers? Source: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

- ALT1: ... that Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics marked the fifth straight Winter Olympics that they sent one male and female cross-country skier? Source: [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

- Reviewed: [[]]

Improved to Good Article status by MasterMatt12 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting: - n

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @MasterMatt12: Good article but I don't really think that these hooks are interesting. Considering the size of the article, i'm not even sure if this article even has a potential hook. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onegreatjoke: I think it's pretty funny that those were the only Mongolian competitors sent to the entire Olympics that year. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 01:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah but I don't that's really special you know? Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Onegreatjoke: Well, I'll defer to you, of course; but if I read a hook like that, my question would be "why didn't Mongolia send anyone else? And why cross-country, of all things?" That is to say, maybe it's not particularly impressive, but I would want to know more. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging MasterMatt12 to see if another viable hook can be found; if not, it's probably best that the nomination be closed. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The nominator is on Wikibreak and noted in the edit summary of his most recent edit that he is currently not motivated to contribute to Wikipedia. As such, unless another editor adopts this nomination, it doesn't seem like there is a path forward for this anymore. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]