Jump to content

Talk:Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: No dabs

Linkrot: No dead links. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Unlike the previous kits MITS had offered, thousands of calculator orders came in each month. Suggest something like: Thousands of calculator orders came in each month, in contrast to poor results for previous kits that MITS had offered. I assume good faith that you will consider revising this minor grammatical inconsistency as it is really the only problem encountered.
Fixed. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 23:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Otherwise prose is good, I made a number of minor copy-edits and added some wikilinks.[1]]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    References check out, I assume good faith for off-line sources
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Broad and focussed.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Fair and unbiased
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    All OK
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    OK, I consider this interesting article to be worthy of Good Article status. It could do with the addition of Template:Infobox company, but this is not a GA requirement. Congratulations and thanks for preparing it so well for GA review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:08, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]