Jump to content

Talk:Maung Wunna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 25 February 2021

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Maung Wunna (filmmaker) and Wunna (disambiguation)Wunna  — Amakuru (talk) 20:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]



WunnaWunna (filmmaker) – Fails WP:PRIMARYTOPIC; the unrelated Wunna (album) receives substantially more pageviews (229/day vs 6/day) and is likely more famous in the Western world. Nohomersryan (talk) 02:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 4 January 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. And the disambiguation page is not needed any more.  — Amakuru (talk) 21:35, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


– Relisting and adding the disambiguation page, as that will also need to be moved out of the way. -- Aervanath (talk) 16:27, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maung Wunna (filmmaker)Maung Wunna – Unnecessary dab. Burmese names are actually a "single" word in the Burmese language – they aren't interchangeable if they are multiple syllables. So for Wunna Maung Lwin, it cannot be mistaken for Maung Wunna Lwin, because that would be a different person (if it actually exists). I suggest just using for/confuse hatnotes for this. Engr. Smitty Werben 15:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see your point. But English-speaking readers won't be familiar with that feature of the Burmese language, so I think confusion could easily happen. Dr. Vogel (talk) 15:42, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Engr. Smitty: Though the rationale seems sound, the current title is the result of a relatively recent RM, so another RM is required because of that if nothing else. Lennart97 (talk) 15:54, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a contested technical request (permalink). Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.