Talk:Marshall Medoff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 9 January 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus against moving the page. (non-admin closure)Ammarpad (talk) 08:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Marshall MedoffMarshall Medoff (economist) – No reason to believe this Marshall Medoff is more significant than Marshall Medoff (attorney), so make this title a redirect to Marshall Medoff (disambiguation) X1\ (talk) 23:16, 9 January 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. bd2412 T 23:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nomination, alongside move of Marshall Medoff (disambiguation)Marshall Medoff. Both entries are stubs with minor notability indicating no reason to force the use of the qualifier "(disambiguation)".    Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 01:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The article Marshall Medoff (attorney) and the two-entry DAB were only created yesterday, and the article has been tagged for notability; it may be too soon to consider a move. 62.165.227.157 (talk) 07:58, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Views for yesterday [[1]] do show that this Marshall Medoff gets nearly 10x the views of the other. If notability is in question and there are only these 2 uses, we could just delete the DAB page and add a hatnote to the attorney per WP:2DABPRIMARY. I have tagged the DAB page with {{One other topic}} since I can't find any others. If this move fails then it should be speedily deleted with {{Db-disambig}}. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:06, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for no indication. No reason to believe that this Marshall Medoff is no longer the primary topic, so status quo. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:17, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Neither of the subjects are outstandingly notable. Leaving it alone gives us "Marshal Medoff" and "Marshal Medoff (attorney)". We simply don't also need "Marshal Medoff (economist) and "Marshal Medoff (disambiguation)". 4 pages is at least 2 too many. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. This proposal simply introduces unnecessary disambiguation, per JHunterJ and Shhhnotsoloud. --В²C 00:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.