Talk:Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series) season 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series, season 3)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Infobox looks good.
  • "also become a co-showrunner" → "also became a co-showrunner"

Cast and characters[edit]

  • No problems here.

Episodes[edit]

  • "Rick, T.C. and Katsumoto" → "Rick, T.C., and Katsumoto"
  • The sentence "Meanwhile, Higgins expresses concern after a first date with her surgeon that he is 'too perfect,'" needs rewording.
  • "Magnum and T.C." → "Magnum, and T.C."

Crossovers[edit]

  • "early 2020 numerous actors" → "early 2020, numerous actors"

Production[edit]

  • "who also co-developed the series and is an executive producer for the series" → "who also co-developed and executive-produced for the series".
  • "start date.[31] September 14, was later" → "start date;[31] September 14 was later"
  • "on the set crowd" → "on the set, crowd"
  • A better, secondary source is needed for Kurt Jones joining the series.
  • "Roger E. Mosley who portrayed" → "Roger E. Mosley, who portrayed"
  • "Dennis Chun who" → "Dennis Chun, who"
  • Remove the space in-between the two references after "introduced in the first season".

Marketing and release[edit]

  • "Blue Bloods" links to a disambiguation page. Fix the link to Blue Bloods.

Viewing figures[edit]

  • This section looks good.
  • Some +7 ratings are already available here.

References[edit]

  • Using this tool, or doing it manually, archive all archivable sources (citations from the Futon Critic can be archived using this).

Overview[edit]

GAN table[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Notes[edit]

  • @TheDoctorWho: I have just finished adding most, if not all my notes. This article is well-written, but has some small issues to address. Please leave comments, and ping me back when you have done so. I hope I can promote this article soon. Some Dude From North Carolinawanna talk? 14:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just now remembering I forgot to archive references, I'll get to that in the morning. TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Sorry it took me so long, IABot was down this morning, everything has been archived so that should address all of your concerns. Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 23:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existent crossovers with other shows[edit]

TheDoctorWho has a hard-on for the "Lenkov-verse", so he thinks it's necessary to mention the possibility of past, non-existent crossovers with MacGyver. I feel any mention is not only unnecessary but completely a waste of time. MacGyver is canceled, and we can't retroactively go back and make Season 3 crossovers for a show that has already officially progressed into its fourth season. 70.113.101.88 (talk) 03:27, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you have a clear issue with following WP:BRD. Perhaps you can only read the things that you want to, because you constantly think you can run around and remove things prior to discussion once challenged, which isn't how Wikipedia works. Regardless, of whether or not it actually happened it was still discussed which means its worth mentioning. TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You might as well tell us what foods catering offered on set every day. You know, there are fancruft wikis galore where you can indulge in trivial minutiae.70.113.101.88 (talk) 03:46, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]