Talk:Low-code

Repeated conversion from redirect

@DIY platform: I appreciate your contributions, but the article content you're trying to establish is currently not suitable for Wikipedia, mostly because of its tone. It sounds very instructional and promotional, incompatible with Wikipedia's goals and scope. I have restored the redirect once again. Please discuss here before repeatedly restoring your preferred version. Thanks! Ovinus (talk) 15:01, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks @Ovinus for reaching out to us to share the changes that you made to the page we just updated, we would really appreciate if you would point out the sections of the article where you feel it's getting promotional. Prior to our addition, the page was serving no purpose apart from being an anchor to other page. DIY platform (talk) 15:08, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Most of it, I'm afraid. First, articles should not have a conversational tone or ask rhetorical questions (see the description of principle). Second, we need to be careful stating opinions as facts; for example, Now considered the go-to or effective way of building applications without the complexity of handwritten code, it is more cost-effective and time-saving, providing exposure to add more functionalities and logic with no handwritten codes resulting in quicker deployment is an opinion. Who, specifically, holds this opinion? Finally, there are also many passages of fluffy corporate speak, such as The consistent factor about these vendors of low-code platforms is their willingness to help businesses and developers meet increasing demands to build applications around internal workflows, customer-facing experience, integrations, and automation. Please try to write concisely and with minimal jargon—as examples, words to watch include "solutions", "factors", "workflows", "continuous integration", "customer satisfaction", "value" (in the business sense), "professional", and unnecessary capitalization. That's not to say these words cannot be used entirely—they may be appropriate in quotes—but they generally compromise the encyclopedic tone. Hope that helps. I suggest you develop material in your draft space (for example, create User:DIY platform/sandbox) and ask for advice from there; I am open to that. Cheers! Ovinus (talk) 15:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)