Talk:Live Oak Plantation, Florida
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Florida stub]] on the article page.
- If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
- If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Florida|class=stub|importance=}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Live Oak Plantation, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071111015458/http://tourtimeinc.com/new_package.html to http://tourtimeinc.com/new_package.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Why I refer to Live Oak as a forced-labor farm.
[edit]Calling these enterprises plantations is a euphemism; in an era before mechanized farming and before the Thirteenth Ammendment, they survived on the labor of enslaved people who had not even the most basic control of their lives or bodies. My use of "forced-labor farm" term has been called "not helpful," but, with all due respect to the descendants of Live Oak's owners, I would argue that it IS helpful to the descenants of those workers. It tells the truth of what was done to them and the truth of what was actually going on. The racist ideas of the American past lied to all Americans and what some of the country seems to find most difficult to face is that it lied to Whites, telling them they were naturally superior to everyone else, when history shows us this is not true. Clinging to these lies makes everyone, including Whites, weaker and smaller people. Let's just handle the issue looking it straight in the eye and then build a new way forward. Oona Wikiwalker (talk) 04:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- First, we go by what reliable sources say, and the sources used for this article call it a plantation. Second, chattel slavery is a particularly repugnant form of forced labor, and it is widely understood that ante-bellum plantations in the southern United States were based on chattel slavery. Moreover, in my opinion, using "forced labor" instead of "slavery" is hiding the true horror of how people were treated on plantations. I see a trend of being mealy-mouthed about slavery as it was practiced in the Americas, as though somehow using euphemisms will lessen the horror and perceived stigma of slavery. I think it goes hand-in-hand with attempts to pretend that slavery was not really bad for the slaves. "Slavery" is a perfectly good word to describe the condition of workers on plantation, and I oppose any effort to hide that fact with euphemisms. Donald Albury 13:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)