Talk:Life imprisonment in England and Wales

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Who is the prisoner that is "thought to have been released on compassionate grounds"? Is it Al-Megrahi? If it is, we should make reference to him. H7dders (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It can't be: Al-Megrahi was subject to Scots law. Chuggsymalone 00:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Richardhearnden (talk • contribs)

Life licence

I'd love to know what a life licence is and what it means, since life licence redirects here. ~ Pony Toast...§ 03:14, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning a revision of this article, including adding detail about such concepts. I will post comments here once I have a draft. Muriosity (talk) 17:51, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to this article

An anonymous editor keeps adding incorrect information to this article. Please be aware that the Home Secretary's proposal to have mandatory whole life orders for those who murder police officers is just a proposal, it has not been enacted into law. Also there is an absolute prohibition on imposing whole life terms on defendants under the age of 21, there is no exception based on maturity or anything else. Any further such edits will be treated as vandalism. Richard75 (talk) 18:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Homophobic and racist offences don't have a starting point of a whole life order either. Please see Schedule 21 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Richard75 (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Offenders under 21

The article states that instead of life imprisonment, an offender

between 18 and 21 gets custody for life
under 18 whose offence was murder gets detention during Her Majesty's pleasure
under 18 otherwise gets detention for life

but fails to distinguish these terms from each other and from life imprisonment (except HM pleasure which is defined via a link to the article on the topic). What's the difference? "Imprisonment", "custody" and "detention" don't have obviously different meanings. Hairy Dude (talk) 03:02, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Life imprisonment in England and Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102143618/http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/619.htm to http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/619.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:21, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Related to USA

Is a whole life tariff the same as life without parole in the USA? If so, perhaps that could be added? Jhurley85 (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Effects of Brexit

The reference in the article to the possibility of the appeal of a Whole Life Order to the European Court of Human Rights would now seem to be obsolete, since the ECHR would no longer have any jurisdiction in regard to England and Wales, would it?2600:1004:B161:9AEA:0:45:5360:1601 (talk) 16:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is incorrect, ECHR jurisdiction is independent from membership of the EU. The UK is one of the founders of the ECHR, and the only reason why it's considering withdrawal is to avoid being easily prosecuted for submissions relating to the Rwanda scheme. Full article here: Mitsilegas, V., and Guild, E. (2024). The UK and the ECHR After Brexit: The Challenge of Immigration Control. European Convention on Human Rights Law Review (published online ahead of print 2024), Available From: Brill https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10079 92.18.4.188 (talk) 16:03, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]