Jump to content

Talk:Libya Contact Group

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Members

[edit]

Is the member list sourced in a way I missed (we're going to need in-line citations here...), or is it based on that list compiled by the IP user on the NTC's foreign relations page? If its the latter, we need a source for this.--Yalens (talk) 01:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's all in the "external links" section. We can do it as in-line citations, but I thought it might clutter up the page unnecessarily, especially since the nature of the list format means a lot of information is repeated. -Kudzu1 (talk) 01:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe there should be map of the Benelux instead of Belgium's, Netherlands', Luxembug's flags???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Benelux.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.63.223.4 (talk) 15:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In London there were more attendees: http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/news/latest-news/?view=News&id=575082282 and this photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/foreignoffice/5570825713/ I think that in London every interested country decided which countries can constantly decide about Libya's future. Mostly where those, which have there some business. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.63.228.202 (talk) 23:05, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best for the dedicated page for the London Conference. -Kudzu1 (talk) 23:25, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Probably yes. Also I've found on the website of the Ministry of the Foreign Affaires of Belgium http://diplomatie.belgium.be/en/newsroom/news/press_releases/foreign_affairs/2011/04/ni_080411_internationale_contactgroep_libie.jsp?referer=tcm:312-124319-64 I think reading this that the british minister decides who should be invited to the Group and in which character.
And here is a good source for Bulgaria joining http://www.mfa.bg/en/News/view/31414

Maybe chairmans should be inclouded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.63.228.202 (talk) 23:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]