Talk:Lateran Palace

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Catholicism Low‑importance

Lateran Palace is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

edit
history
watch
purge

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Pictures of the original

Are there any images of the original Lateran Palace that Sixtus V tore down? john k (talk) 14:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Built when?

The first paragraph, "Pre-Papal History," mentions only the basilica, not the palace itself -- but nowhere is there a statement of when the original palace (or the basilica) was first constructed, only when it was given over to the papacy. Anybody know? --Michael K Smith^Talk 18:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editor needed

This article needs attention from a copy editor; the author wrote almost the entire article in the passive voice. Help, please! Foreignshore (talk) 16:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC) Foreignshore[reply]

What country is the palace in?

From what I understand, the Palace is on Italian soil, but owned by the Vatican and having diplomatic status (similar to an embassy). Is that correct? If so, the information should be in the lede, because otherwise readers might infer that the Palace is in Vatican City. Mathew5000 (talk) 22:59, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's an extraterritorial piece of the Vatican. Not sure what status that has in international law. Laurel Lodged (talk) 23:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think you may be incorrect in that. As I understand it, the palace is extraterritorial property of the Vatican, not a “piece” of the Vatican. But I haven't found a reliable third-party source that explains it clearly. Mathew5000 (talk) 06:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lateran Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110813090725/http://www.vaticanstate.va/NR/rdonlyres/3F574885-EAD5-47E9-A547-C3717005E861/2528/LateranTreaty.pdf to http://www.vaticanstate.va/NR/rdonlyres/3F574885-EAD5-47E9-A547-C3717005E861/2528/LateranTreaty.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"The Domus was eventually given to the Bishop of Rome by Constantine"

Wasn't this disproven centuries ago when the Donation of Constantine was proven to be a forgery? Or is there additional evidence? If so, it's lacking. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 21:14, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The information is credible because it has been cited using reliable sources.

The Oxford Dictionary of Popes, p 26-27, edited by J. N. D. Kelly, Oxford University Press, 1986 EXANXC (talk) 14:16, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The "additional evidence" would be that the papacy was in occupation from around this time. Just because the Donation of Constantine is a forgery doesn't mean that C never gave the papacy anything. Johnbod (talk) 14:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]