This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Currently, this article only has information about the development of English in artificial intelligence and how it is used for communication with humans. What it is lacking is the use of generative AI and natural language processing (NLP) for better communication and to learn from conversations with humans. To do this, I can use articles/scholarly papers such as: https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0108005. This will help in learning how sentence creation works and how it is developed for better language generation of AI. The goal of this article should be to express how language generation is evolving and not people's plain opinions about this topic. Facts about language generation in AI will show its development and how it can be used in many other situations such as interlinguistic conversations. Sakydakylicious (talk) 02:57, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This sounds like a reasonable direction to take on this project. Keep in mind that new research papers are primary sources, while they can have information that is useful to add to Wikipedia, they are also of varying quality. In particular, articles on preprint servers are considered "generally unreliable". See WP:ARXIV. Try to find some coverage of this topic in secondary sources, such as books from reputable publishers or review articles in quality journals. Groceryheist (talk) 03:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
