Talk:LAUNCH Conference

This appears to have been written by someone with a POV in favor of LAUNCH and against TechCrunch. This needs to be fixed. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:36, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you can be more specific, I can change it. I tried to reference the articles (atlantic) and the TechCrunch site for what they stand for. I can tell you I (as the author) have no bias against TechCrunch (I even was Thanked by them publicly on a post last week), so if you can tell me what words/references you don't like, let's change it. This was/is however, a big deal for tech conferences where publishers with conferences choose not to cover each other - do they make news, or report it? So if we can find a way to include that angle, since I think it's important, let's fix it! Geoffclapp (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did quite a few minor edits. I've presented at both TechCrunch Disrupt and LAUNCH, know both Jason Calacanis and Mike Arrington, and don't feel biased as an editor. I've been adding factual information in any case. Terrycojones (talk) 21:57, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I asked another reader to pickout sections they thought might effect POV, and edited the sections, please let me know if you think this helps. I want to keep the controversy (b/c I think it's important to determine the role of journalism in making news and choosing not to report it, for whatever reason, when it is part of your mission). That said, I don't have a dog in that fight, so I want to be sure this is not bias. Thoughts? Geoffclapp (talk) 22:00, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2017?

Was looking for the location.

https://www.launchfestival.com/ has a fly by video of SF in the background, but thats all i got. Mathiastck (talk) 21:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on LAUNCH Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150316205545/https://www.prehire.io/ to http://prehire.io/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160416011306/https://www.getflyr.com/ to https://www.getflyr.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160315214743/http://www.synata.com/ to http://www.synata.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]