Talk:Kalinga Magha

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Sri Lanka High‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Rewrote the entire article, including references, and tried to remove the many unsubstatiated historical claims and what appeared to be subtle efforts at providing modern political views with a historical basis. Can people writing articles on Sri Lankan history please desist from imbuing them with bias (whatever that may be)! DocSubster 19:06, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good article, but needs some more work. First off, the title is Kalinga Magha, but your lead calls him Magha first. It seems to me that the main title/name he is associated with should be used in the title and the first part of the lead.
While you explain that nothing is known of him before the invasion, you don't explain what happened to him after he was deposed. If there is no info about that, please mention that, as well.
The references need to be consolidated. 7,8, and 9 can be combined into one, since you're only citing chapters, and those references all cover the same chapters.
I don't want to sound negative about it, since it is well written and informative. It just needs some more work. Hope these criticisms are helpful.
By the way, you put in an assessment request, but didn't tag it for assessment. I have done this for you. If you feel this is an error, please go ahead and delete the tag. Jeffpw 19:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE CHANGE TITLE

Can someone please change the title of this page to 'Magha', as I have no idea how to do it myself! 131.111.8.98 09:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

massive migration, really?

Is there actually any evidence of a mass migration of people who escaped Magha's rule? Its a well known fact that the rulers of the Sinhala Kingdom had to withdraw, but I find it very unlikely that the majority of people who lived in those areas all fled to the south west. If this was the case there would be archaelogical and literary evidence of either a mass migration to the south or a mass displacement from those regions conquered by Magha.

Nagadeepa (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This fits well with the Sinhala Buddhist ideology propagated in many of these type of articles. Where ever possible they have emphasized the North belonged to Sinhales and these Tamil kings just kicked them out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.123.169.254 (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

‍Not just north, but the entire Island used to belong to Sinhalese, and Sinhala monarchy. Read the Mahavansa to find out what Kalinga Magha had done to the Sinhalese monarchy in the sri lanka. denying the history, and historical facts prove your Sinhalesephobia, and bigotry sentiment. Kalinga Magha massacred thousands of innocent sinhalese, forced converted buddhists, destroyed buddhist temples, and stupas. Ceylonpedia (talk) 01:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC) http://www.lankadeepa.lk/diyatha_news/%E0%B6%B8%E0%B7%8F%E0%B6%9D-%E0%B6%9A%E0%B7%85-%E0%B6%85%E0%B6%B4%E0%B6%BB%E0%B7%8F%E0%B6%B0/48-532521[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kalinga Magha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927085703/http://lakdiva.org/culavamsa/vol_1.html to http://lakdiva.org/culavamsa/vol_1.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927085703/http://lakdiva.org/culavamsa/vol_1.html to http://lakdiva.org/culavamsa/vol_1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]