Jump to content

Talk:Jonathan Barrios

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Soccerway, again

[edit]

According to [1] the guy had some caps in 2007/08. He also didn't start his senior club career in his mid 20s. This is another example of why soccerway is not an WP:RS - regurgitating soccerway stuff without even a cursory look elsewhere only leads to these sort of crappy, error-strewn stubs. Målfarlig! (talk) 14:27, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing the new source. It would be helpful if you add it first into the article instead of mentioning it in the talk page. Cheers! MbahGondrong (talk) 18:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it would be helpful if you looked beyond Soccerway when making your stubs. I recognise that you have made an effort to do so over the last couple of days. Målfarlig! (talk) 19:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I do not need to do that, but I will try if I have the time. Cheers! MbahGondrong (talk) 19:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:YFA before churning out any more single-sentence stubs referenced only to Soccerway. Målfarlig! (talk) 20:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please also take a minute to read and understand WP:NOTREQUIRED. Cheers! MbahGondrong (talk) 20:52, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTREQUIRED is not an excuse to dance on the grave of WP:BLP and WP:V. Please have some consideration for editors who have to mop up your shite. Cheers! Målfarlig! (talk) 21:31, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am not dancing on anything, I use a commonly used source in wiki, that is used in plenty of football articles for a long time. You can easily report me if you think otherwise, there are many ways to do that also, just saying. WP:NOTREQUIRED actually also applies for you, you are not obligated to mop up any editors edits. Please do not think that you are a special editor. Cheers! MbahGondrong (talk) 21:56, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm only here to improve the encyclopedia, don't feel humiliated. But clearly as an editor I'm Caravaggio and you're Bob Ross - and that's being very generous. Although I am now becoming bored of your pidgin English trolling, childish edit-warring and other low-level harassment. As a prelude to the report - please explain why you suddenly developed your recent WP:INFOBOXREF obsession, why you apparently only apply it to articles recently edited by one editor (me) and why you don't apply it to the height field(?) It appears to me that you are disrupting wikipedia to make a point. Målfarlig! (talk) 23:13, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, I don't feel ashamed at all with anything. Second, your comparison just shows clearly how you are so full of yourself. To answer your question, I have tried to enforce WP:INFOBOXREF long before I started contact with you with other editors. Do some contribution digging, I know you are really good at it. I am enforcing it more to you in this moment, is because you clearly stated in our previous discussions that you won't follow it, simple as that. If you want consistency for me to move the height also, I will gladly do that. Lastly as a reminder, if you think that I am disrupting wikipedia, there are many outlets to report me. Cheers! MbahGondrong (talk) 23:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]