Talk:John Wagner/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Curly Turkey (talk · contribs) 05:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- There are quite a few uncited passages, including at least one full uncited paragraph. Also, sources such as CBDB and GCD are not considered reliable sources, as their content is user-submitted. Those sources would be appropriate under "External links".
Names of authors cited normally should be cited as last name, first name.
- There are quite a few uncited passages, including at least one full uncited paragraph. Also, sources such as CBDB and GCD are not considered reliable sources, as their content is user-submitted. Those sources would be appropriate under "External links".
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Seems to cover all major aspects.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Has Wagner received no criticism? And is "leading light" in the lead really WP:NPOV?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
- Issues so far appear to be fixed; is the review done? Wizardman 23:16, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ummm...no, actually. There are still uncited passages, and all of the cited authors are still listed first name, last name. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 23:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- In that case it should be failed, the writer's had a month to tackle it. Wizardman 01:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
- Gotcha. Failed. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 01:37, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
- In that case it should be failed, the writer's had a month to tackle it. Wizardman 01:09, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ummm...no, actually. There are still uncited passages, and all of the cited authors are still listed first name, last name. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 23:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)