This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The article on John Martin is one-sided and biased. Too short. Obviously demented freak with no commercial potential. Kinkowarrior (talk) 01:07, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Someone continues to reduce the article to a one-paragraph anti-Martin screed. Probably the jealous failure known as MJP. Kinkowarrior (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please be WP:CIVIL in your comments, and avoid disparaging your fellow editors. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 11:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
