Talk:Johannes Lutz

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles

Military history: Biography / European / German / World War II

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This redirect is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Johannes versus Johann Lutz[edit]

Check WP:SOURCE. It reads "Source material must have been published", "Unpublished materials are not considered reliable". The image File:Urkunde Panzervernichter.jpg is irrelevant to Wiki. The reader has no means to verify the authenticity of the document. Therefore Wiki relies exclusively on published secondary sources. The reader then has the option to buy the book or go to the library. Both Scherzer and Fellgiebel list him under the name of Johannes, not Johann. Also a few online pages list him as Johannes (example das-Ritterkreuz.de). I acknowledge the dilemma of the situation but those are the rules we have to work with. MisterBee1966 (talk) 06:31, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mister Bee, i own the complete Assets of Mr. Johann Lutz including all certificates like Ritterkreuz etc. You can read also the correct name in the divison Book of the 116. Panzerdivision. So it makes no sense to write the wrong name?! How can wen handle it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ww2Historiker (talk • contribs) 11:38, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good question, in these instances we have to rely on published sources. The only way to address this is by pointing out that sources A, B and C say Johannes is correct, while souces X, Y and Z say Johann is correct. MisterBee1966 (talk) 14:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link.

Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect.

K.e.coffman (talk) 21:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]