Talk:Japanese cruiser Ōyodo
Appearance
Japanese cruiser Ōyodo has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 17, 2018. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Japanese cruiser Ōyodo appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese cruiser Ōyodo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 12:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Parsecboy (talk) 12:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
General comments:
- The lead says the ship was obsolete on completion, but this doesn't appear to be explained in the body
- Watch ENGVAR - I see "draught" and "metre" vs. "armor" and later "meter"
- Link aircraft carrier, Tokyo Bay, Chiyoda
- Watch unit designations - Third Fleet vs. 1st Fleet - also, when did Oyodo move between the fleets?
- "reversed course at 23:30 and head for Amami Ōshima" -> "and headed for..."
- Convert 250lb
Images:
- File:Japanese cruiser Oyodo in 1944.jpg - I would bet Nikki would want a translation of the source
- The scrapping photo is probably actually a USN photo - compare to this and this - not a big deal, just noticed those in the NHHC collection
- There's a line-drawing here if you want it
- Dunno if you find this photo at Cape Engano or this one of Ozawa transferring to the ship useful.
Parsecboy (talk) 12:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for these, I completely forgot to check the images. I did have to swap out the scrapping photo as the photograph date of '48 falls outside the allowable range for the old-japan-photo license of '47. I'll flesh out the photos if I decide to take it to ACR, but for now I don't want to take the time to get these uploaded properly. Thanks for the thorough reading that caught all the small mistakes. I think that I've fixed them all. Lemme know if not.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- Looks good to me, great work as usual. Parsecboy (talk) 11:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for these, I completely forgot to check the images. I did have to swap out the scrapping photo as the photograph date of '48 falls outside the allowable range for the old-japan-photo license of '47. I'll flesh out the photos if I decide to take it to ACR, but for now I don't want to take the time to get these uploaded properly. Thanks for the thorough reading that caught all the small mistakes. I think that I've fixed them all. Lemme know if not.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:29, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class Japanese military history articles
- Japanese military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- GA-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- GA-Class Shipwreck articles
- Low-importance Shipwreck articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles