Talk:James Markham Ambler

James Markham Ambler has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 31, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

A fact from James Markham Ambler appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 17 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that due to the efforts of James Markham Ambler, the Jeannette expedition became the first Arctic expedition "without a single case of scurvy"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Markham Ambler.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 18:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

James Markham Ambler

... that despite having an opportunity to leave the sunken USS Jeannette, James Markham Ambler (pictured) decided to stay and provide medical attention to the crew? Source: [1], [2]
- ALT1: ... that due to the efforts of James Markham Ambler (pictured), Jeannette expedition became the first arctic expedition "without a single case of scurvy"? Source: https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fanb%2F9780198606697.article.2000022
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/1995 Burlington mayoral election
- Comment: Created by Delqa on May 19. Expanded by me. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 21:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Delqa (talk) and Kavyansh.Singh (talk). Nominated by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) at 21:20, 20 May 2022 (UTC).[reply]

This article is new enough and long enough. It is neutral and cites its sources. I am a little concerned about close paraphrasing from one source: [3]. Both hooks are cited within the article and are interesting to a broad audience. QPQ done. Other than the concern with paraphrasing this article is good to go. I invite a response from the nominator about the potential close paraphrasing and if the text of the article needs to be tweaked. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Trainsandotherthings: Thanks for the review. I made few changes, but most of the other paraphrasing appears to be case of WP:LIMITED, like name and titles of institutions. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - The article looks good to go now. Thanks for the changes. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 12:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Kavyansh.Singh: is the "without scurvy" bit a quote or a summary? The article and the hook don't seem to agree, and I can't access the source... theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 08:18, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      - @Theleekycauldron:: Hi! Added the quotes in the article; does it work? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        Howdy! indeed it does :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 07:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:James Markham Ambler/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: UnidentifiedX (talk · contribs) 08:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will be reviewing the article. Please allow 1-3 days for the assessment to be completed.

Notified[edit]

The nominator and noted co-nominator have been notified of the ongoing review.

Assessment[edit]

Comprehension:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (MoS)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Verifiability:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(c) (original research)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	Check completed by Earwig	Pass

Comprehensiveness:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (focused)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Neutrality:

Notes	Result
The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Stability:

Notes	Result
No visible edit war	Pass

Illustration:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Comments[edit]

Thanks for taking the review, UnidentifiedX, I appreciate it. Let me know if you have any comments, and feel free to take your time. I might be a bit busy in the next two days, but we have @Delqa: as the co-nominator. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I want to ensure you are aware of what is going on regarding the review and its status. I have made a few edits and have added a few things to the article; I will continue to do so. I expect the review to be completed within the next 48 hours. Have a good day! UnidentifiedX (talk) 19:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I made some change in your suggested wording. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 20:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I just need to do the MoS check and then I’ll pass the article. In the meantime I’ll get something done about the orphan link Christopher J. Huggard - UnidentifiedX (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion[edit]

Congratulations! The article has passed the GA assessment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnidentifiedX (talk • contribs) 07:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]