Talk:J. Lister Holmes
 | J. Lister Holmes is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Generalissima (talk) (it/she) at 23:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Short description: American architect (1891–1896) |
 | A fact from J. Lister Holmes appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Launchballer talk 20:31, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- ... that J. Lister Holmes switched from designing Tudor Revival cottages to Modernist civic buildings?
- Source: Dietz, Duane A. (2014). "J. Lister Holmes". In Ochsner, Jeffery Karl (ed.). Shaping Seattle Architecture: A Historical Guide to the Architects (2nd ed.). Seattle: University of Washington Press. ISBN 9780295806891. JSTOR j.ctvcwnd1m. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcwnd1m.42 pp. 248-253
Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 04:56, 16 August 2024 (UTC).
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
- ... that William Aitken, William J. Bain, J. Lister Holmes, John T. Jacobsen, and George W. Stoddard collaborated in the early 1940s to design the nation's first racially integrated public housing development?
- Source: https://pcad.lib.washington.edu/building/5319/ Pacific Coast Architecture Database, University of Washington.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Oliver Gould Jennings House (x2), Template:Did you know nominations/Edwin Ford Piper, Template:Did you know nominations/Portrait of Cornelis van der Geest
Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:39, 21 August 2024 (UTC).
- I'll review this. BeanieFan11 (talk) 01:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Nice work. Some minor issues. First, should the hook specify that it is the first racially integrated public housing development to match what the sources say? Also, in J. Lister Holmes, I read In 1940, he was tasked by the Seattle Housing Authority to serve as the chief architect of the Yesler Terrace development, the first public housing development in the United States.
That doesn't sound right, given that the hook is referring to it as the first racially-integrated one? Clear these two things up and it should be good to go. BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @BeanieFan11: oops! Thank you for catching the typo on Holmes and good fix with the hook. Corrected on both counts. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 16:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:J. Lister Holmes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hydrangeans (talk · contribs) 20:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I'm expecting to have a bit of time in the coming week, so I'll probably review around next weekend if that's alright. I'll pick up some of the sources from the library in the meantime so I can give the best review I can. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 20:08, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Hydrangeans: Just checking in! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 23:19, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for checking in. I'm sorry about the tardiness of the review. I got distracted and caught up in other tasks this weekend. I admittedly don't have a good excuse for this; there are some IRL deadlines, but the press is from bad planning on my part. Is it okay if I try to do the GA review in the next couple of days? I should be able to get it done once sit down with it for some blocked out time because I now have the sources I wanted to read and check. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 01:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Totally fine with me - I have a habit of procrastination with these too! - was just checking in cause I know its easy to forget. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 01:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for checking in. I'm sorry about the tardiness of the review. I got distracted and caught up in other tasks this weekend. I admittedly don't have a good excuse for this; there are some IRL deadlines, but the press is from bad planning on my part. Is it okay if I try to do the GA review in the next couple of days? I should be able to get it done once sit down with it for some blocked out time because I now have the sources I wanted to read and check. Hydrangeans (she/her | talk | edits) 01:01, 25 November 2024 (UTC)