Talk:Ivo Pilar

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Slight NPOV

The text needs to be slightly NPOVized. It really, really glorifies Ivo Pilar, but does not mention the controversial things he had claimed, which do not make him quite an angel. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 00:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lowered the assessment from C to Start class: barely referenced, POVish. GregorB (talk) 18:44, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article should be removed or rewritten

This article should be removed or rewritten completely. It's rather like a pamphlet of blatant ethno-nationalistic propaganda instead article of encyclopedia. Article has multiple issues, from NPOV to simple fact that does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. --Santasa99 (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This person's notability is glaringly obvious from a simple search such as http://www.google.com/search?lr=lang_en&tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=%22Ivo+Pilar%22&pws=0 Maybe you should think about not letting your own personal biases affect your reading of the policies. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ivo Pilar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718134935/http://www.gradskagroblja.hr/Trazilica/MapPreview.aspx?CemeteryID=1&Field=7&DeptID=1&PersonID=119041 to http://www.gradskagroblja.hr/Trazilica/MapPreview.aspx?CemeteryID=1&Field=7&DeptID=1&PersonID=119041
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060514020210/http://www.pilar.hr/index2.html to http://www.pilar.hr/index2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pilar's death

The entire write-up on Pilar's supposedly "suspicious" death is POV nonsense, IMHO.

"The press in Belgrade claimed it was a suicide" - why does it matter what press in Belgrade said? Pilar died in Zagreb - what did the press in Zagreb say? Well, in all likelihood it said the same, but why miss the opportunity to POV-frame the story?

"Open window of his apartment" - unheard of.

"The fact that Pilar never owned a weapon" - well, either Pilar never owned a weapon (ergo, was actually murdered), or he actually did own a weapon, so this "fact" is not a fact after all. A nice example of begging the question.

"That he was killed by Serbian secret agents like other Croatian patriots such as Milan Šufflay in 1931". Šufflay was ambushed in the street and killed with a hammer. What exactly is similar in these two cases? GregorB (talk) 11:29, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]