Talk:Solus Christus

Christianity: Theology / Lutheranism / Reformed Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Lutheranism (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Reformed Christianity portal This article is supported by WikiProject Reformed Christianity (assessed as Mid-importance).

Requested move 25 May 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move the article has been established within the RM time period and thus defaulting to not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Music1201 ^talk 02:30, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Solus Christus → Solo Christo – This term belongs in the Latin ablative case: "BY Christ alone", not just "The sole Christ" (in the nominative case, which is for the subject of a sentence). Deus vult (aliquid)! Crusadestudent (talk) 22:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. Jujutsuan (talk | contribs) 11:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Wikipedia generally cares more about the most common name, which as you can see from this ngram is clearly the current title. Unless there's some sort of naming convention for Latin that supports the change, I think we should stick as is. Jenks24 (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All of the other articles on the five solae use the ablative. This one should be no different per WP:CONSISTENCY. In English it's called "by Christ alone", not "the sole/only Christ" (which is what the current title says). Deus vult (aliquid)! Crusadestudent (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:COMMONNAME. St Anselm (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Solus Christus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070227214406/http://www.monergism.com/directory/link_category/Five-Solas/ to http://www.monergism.com/directory/link_category/Five-Solas/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]