Talk:Iliad SA
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Requested move 7 February 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that Iliad SA be renamed and moved to Iliad (company). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Iliad SA → Iliad (company) – Restoring the original name of the page, moved it at the time without consent. I think it is more compliant with the rules on WP:TITLE. InterComMan (talk) 11:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- That move was 11 years ago. My understanding is that names like this one are relatively common to provide WP:NATURAL disambiguation. — BarrelProof (talk) 22:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: I mistakenly closed this discussion as moved; I've re-opened it and relisted it. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:07, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment, using the legal status is a natural alternative to using a disambiguator under WP:NCCORP, so don't see the issue unless the name with legal status is never used in sources. But the website also uses "Iliad Group". DankJae 17:40, 16 February 2025 (UTC)