Talk:Ianto's Shrine
Ianto's Shrine was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 3, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Ianto's Shrine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 02:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
- ... that a shrine (pictured) dedicated to the fictional character Ianto Jones is visited by people from around the world?
- ALT1: ... that fans created Ianto's Shrine (pictured) after the death of a fictional character? Source: "In 2009, during the third series titled “Children of Earth”, Ianto met his untimely death which left fans shocked and heartbroken. What started as few flowers laid down at Mermaid Quay (the location used as Torchwood’s base) soon turned into hundreds more from grieving fans worldwide who decided to pay their respects to this much-loved character."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Croton alabamensis
- Comment: Could also be a non-picture hook if needed.
Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 02:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Good job! TheNuggeteer (talk) 06:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice work on your interesting new article!
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ianto's Shrine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Suntooooth (talk · contribs) 21:59, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 15:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Six GA Criteria
[edit]1. Article is well-written.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses no fair use media.
Lead
[edit]-Clarify that the Torchwood Institute is a fictional location in the show.
-"and was later featured in an episode of Torchwood." Clarify the Shrine specifically was, not the location.
History
[edit]-Did James Moran work on Torchwood, or was he was an unassociated writer?
-" A common theme for tributes is LGBTQ stories" how is this communicated at the Shrine? Are there any examples we could include?
Overall
[edit]-Comment before I do the spotcheck: What are the reliability of Silverscreen Tours, End of Show, Explorial, InterCardiff, and We are Cardiff? A brief peruse makes me iffy on the reliability of a few of these but I'd appreciate your input before I make any rash assessments. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 15:56, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm really sorry to waste your time, but due to IRL factors I just don't have the energy for working on this. Feel free to continue the review with the article in its current state, or just quickfail if you don't think it would pass without making improvements - I can always re-nominate a couple months down the line when I'm feeling better. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 04:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Suntooooth Really the only thing that would greatly affect this review is source reliability, so if you're willing to get that clarified, the other things I would be willing to wait for a while on. If you feel it's best, though, I can fail this review for now and then take it on again when you re-nominate this. Entirely up to you on how you want to proceed with this. Regardless, I hope things go smoothly IRL on your end. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's probably best to just fail the review, since if it's left open there's a very good chance I'd entirely forget about it. Thanks for your understanding. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 21:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Suntooooth gotcha. I'll fail the nom for now, but feel free to renominate this once you're ready. Hope all goes well on your end. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 21:34, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's probably best to just fail the review, since if it's left open there's a very good chance I'd entirely forget about it. Thanks for your understanding. Suntooooth, it/he (talk/contribs) 21:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Suntooooth Really the only thing that would greatly affect this review is source reliability, so if you're willing to get that clarified, the other things I would be willing to wait for a while on. If you feel it's best, though, I can fail this review for now and then take it on again when you re-nominate this. Entirely up to you on how you want to proceed with this. Regardless, I hope things go smoothly IRL on your end. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 17:17, 3 November 2024 (UTC)