Talk:I Still See Your Face/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 18:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Short article that won't take too long; will start reviewing today or tomorrow. --K. Peake 18:44, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail[edit]

Sorry I have to do this, I was going to go through in full when I initially noticed the issues because I thought they would be minor; however, this article is way too far from being broad in its coverage. There is a lack of sources to indicate this, with many coming from YouTube and Twitter alongside unreliable ones such as Highclouds.org and Spotify. On top of this, the lead is poorly written with info being crammed together like in the last sentence and things are not organised well in the body that also shows a lack of broadness with only two sections of prose. ✗ Fail time now. --K. Peake 09:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]