Talk:Hyunmoo-3

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hyunmoo-3 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Korean / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Korean military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

What is the meaning of nuclear warhead

Since South Korea is a signatory to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state, it is illegal for it to acquire nuclear weapons. Therefore, this missile cannot legally carry a nuclear warhead.

Any reference to a nuclear warhead must be subtantiated or else must be removed from the article.

Also, the article says that South Korea canot produce weapons with a certain range/payload according to MTCR. This is untrue. South Korea and other MTCR nations cannot buy or sell technology beyond the payload/range restriction in MTCR, however, they are free to develop indegenous technologies without any restrictions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.164.212.189 (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speed issue

Is the missile subsonic or Mach 1.2? Design doesn't look supersonic to me with that wing. Hcobb (talk) 02:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]