This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
It would sure be interesting to know what kind of trees grow there.[edit]
They are deformed, but what are they? Poplar? Birch? Beech? Spruce? Is there poison ivy? Devil's club? What sort of berries grow there? What sort of herbs? Are there any animals? How tall does the timber grow? Is there good soil underneath, or is it rocky, sandy, glacial morraine? That is what I came to the article to look for. This really doesn't tell much about the forest itself, other than to say it is spooky and a good tourist destination. Hypercallipygian (talk) 22:49, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article started as a translation of the Romainian Wikipedia page. If you go there, you can see a list (in Romanian) of flora and fauna. I agree it would be good to have this information translated here, but I can only read Romanian at perhaps the 10% level (thanks to cognates).
That is not a reliable source. Edward321 (talk) 02:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, what is "reliable" when it comes to UFOs? Nothing really, but dismissing it isn't right either. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8071:2383:CF00:C9B0:33BC:CD85:A398 (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Some sources refer to this forest as Hoia-Baciu, others just as Hoia. I suppose this alternate name should get mentioned somewhere, but just throwing it into the Paranormal section doesn't seem quite right. And a disambiguation page would be needed as well, right? —jmcgnh(talk)(contribs) 21:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]