Talk:History of Queen of the South F.C.

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Scottish football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Merger proposal

Closed as oppose. Giant Snowman 12:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

It has been suggested that the List of Queen of the South F.C. seasons article be merged into the History of Queen of the South F.C. article. Discussion taking place here. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 20:42, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I dont see any reason why this should not happen. RJC 15:31, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Oppose, it's a completely different concept of article. This is a statistical summary, whereas the history article is descriptive. Presumably the nominator also thinks that List of Manchester United F.C. seasons and the History of Manchester United F.C. articles should be merged? Jmorrison230582 (talk) 06:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - most major clubs have separate History articles and Seasons lists and it has never been considered an issue before..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - both articles are lengthy and pretty comprehensive, the list one needs refs but that's no reason to want to merge them. The nominator has given no reason for wanting the move and it seems like a typical 'drive by' nomination by someone who has no knowledge of the subject or the general consensus. Bladeboy1889 (talk) 08:17, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - both articles are notable WP:SPINOFFS of Queen of the South F.C.. Mentoz86 (talk) 07:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - It appears customary for these articles to be separate with regard to the coverage of other football clubs as has been mentioned. Cal Umbra 18:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Queen of the South F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090818192044/http://qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/721/reftab/54/Default.aspx to http://qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/721/reftab/54/Default.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402034541/http://qosfc.com/new_report.aspx?fixtureid=361 to http://qosfc.com/new_report.aspx?fixtureid=361

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Queen of the South F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://icdumfries.icnetwork.co.uk/gallowaynews/sport/tm_headline%3Dmccall-grasps-the-thistle%26method%3Dfull%26objectid%3D19225906%26siteid%3D77296-name_page.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090817130927/http://www.qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/729/reftab/36/Default.aspx to http://qosfc.com/HeadlineNews/ViewFullStory/tabid/151/selectmoduleid/498/ArticleID/729/reftab/36/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]