Jump to content

Talk:Hashimpura massacre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Hashimpura massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is the alleged involvement of the 19 PAC personnel that is not proved. The fact that 42 dead bodies were recovered the next day is not disputed by any one. By describing this as "an act of alleged mass murder" it seems to imply that the incident never occurred. Hence I am removing the word "alleged" from the first sentence -Sahir 06:04, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In cold blood

[edit]

In the intro to the article it is referenced that the victims were “shot in cold blood”. I’m new to Wikipedia’s backdoor and don’t want to start anything. I feel like the term “shot in cold blood” expresses a personal feeling rather than facts the way it was. Again, might be wrong, but reading it felt more opinion than historical. Thanks for hearing me out! Potatoesandtoast (talk) 05:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]