Talk:Hall/Nimbus station/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 00:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif (talk) 00:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

History and talk stable
Infobox standard
Copyvio clear
Sources and refs good
Is it possible to squeeze in an image of the sculpture?
Asking if there's any more content that could be included?
Prose fine.

Overall

on hold Short but sweet. Kingsif (talk) 00:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for taking this on, Kingsif. I believe everything that needs to be mentioned about this particular station has been covered. It's rather uneventful. Nothing more to add for now. --truflip99 (talk) 02:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Alrighty, @Truflip99:, you get a pass :) Kingsif (talk) 05:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.