Talk:Haliurunas
Appearance
A fact from Haliurunas appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:16, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Haliurunas, the pagan priestesses of the Goths, may have been banished for having predicted the outcome of a battle wrong?
- ALT1:... that the Haliurunas, the pagan priestesses of the Goths, may have fallen victim to a change in cult?
- ALT2:... that the Haliurunas, the pagan priestesses of the Goths, were portrayed by Christians as having engendered the Huns with unclean spirits?
- ALT3:... that the Haliurunas, the pagan priestesses of the Goths, may mean "Hell runners"?
- ALT4:... that the Haliurunas, may have been the Gothic pagan priestesses of the goddess of the dead?
ALT5:... that the account of the Haliurunas in the 6th century work on the history of the Goths, the Getica, is a precursor to later Christian traditions that wise women had sex and orgies with demons and the Devil?- ALT6:... that the account of the Haliurunas in the 6th century history of the Goths, the Getica, is a precursor to later Christian traditions that wise women had sex and orgies with demons and the Devil?
Created by Berig (talk). Self-nominated at 20:15, 15 October 2021 (UTC).
- The article was made on the 10th and nominated on the 15th, so is new enough. The article is clearly long enough and it reads neutrally, uses inline citations, and the copyvio detector is only finding the direct quotes used in the article. The hooks all look good and are interesting (though ALT5 is too long, so I've stricken it). You only have 2 DYK credits, so no QPQ required just yet and there's no image to review. So the only thing to hold this submission up is, which hook would you prefer, @Berig:? Because they all meet the criteria. SilverserenC 20:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- ALT5 may be the "hookiest", and is only 6 characters too long. It could easily be edited to an acceptable length. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- OK, I rephrase it as ALT6 and suggest it be chosen.–Berig (talk) 20:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Approve ALT6 Good to go then! SilverserenC 20:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, all!–Berig (talk) 22:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class history articles
- Mid-importance history articles
- WikiProject History articles
- B-Class Spirituality articles
- Low-importance Spirituality articles
- B-Class Women in Religion articles
- Low-importance Women in Religion articles