Talk:Gunslinger Girl
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 June 2019 and 31 July 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HistoryNerd52.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Rumors of a third season
[edit]Any reliable rumors we could report? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:11, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gunslinger Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.animax-asia.com/program/synopsis.php?i=154
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608070730/http://www.mania.com/funimation-makes-august-splash_article_115508.html to http://www.mania.com/funimation-makes-august-splash_article_115508.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gunslinger Girl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312002606/http://torforge.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/new-life-for-a-fan-favorite-gunslinger-girl/ to http://torforge.wordpress.com/2011/02/01/new-life-for-a-fan-favorite-gunslinger-girl/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
My review
[edit]This article is in need of some serious work, there are hardly any citations at all, barely any content, and not enough aspects covered.
I realize that this manga is not extremely well known and will fly under many fans' radars but if I can improve it then I will try my best starting now. Im seeing that ANN has been referenced but I would say it rests in a gray area. Most of what they say seems to be true but it would be better if multiple anime/manga news companies reported on the same things and reviewed each other's work.
Manga and anime coverage itself is difficult enough in the US due to most reliable sources related to it being mostly in Japanese. A good idea might be to cite the work itself as well as official websites and companies that have the license for distributing Gunslinger Girl to North America such as Funimation and Seven Seas Entertainment. ANN might be very close to being legit but please be cautious when using it because there aren't enough similar news groups to verify the same information yet.HistoryNerd52 (talk) 04:15, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
- HistoryNerd52, OK, but... a. the article has 22 footnotes, which is a lot; in addition, there is a "further reading" section. So what I think you need to do here is explain why these aren't enough, or good enough, or whatever. Moreover, please don't get hung up on the links/references stuff: I do not see, anywhere in your review, comments on the prose, on the lay-out, the paragraphing, the sections, the tone... And there is something else I need you to see: I mentioned in class how broad coverage is in this area. Note the "ancillary" articles, like List of Gunslinger Girl episodes (and look up WP:WALLEDGARDEN)--and then note that that article is an FA, but the review is just really pathetic--we had much lower standards in 2007: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Gunslinger Girl episodes. Dr Aaij (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- Dr Aaij All that I can think of is for the details about the plot to be expanded on, covering all 15 volumes. The series doesn't have much coverage and isn't popular enough to get much attention from Wikipedia users. I was looking at the paragraphs at the bottom and I don't know how they can be changed to better other than having a little more information and detail put into them. HistoryNerd52 (talk) 20:58, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- HistoryNerd52, that may be so, yet I still think you could say more about the article besides just talking about the coverage. I think you are confusing "evaluating" with "saying negative things"--but you might consider a different article, then... Dr Aaij (talk) 22:30, 14 June 2019 (UTC)