Talk:GtkRadiant

This page was proposed for deletion by Neelix (talk · contribs) on 7 August 2012 with the comment:
A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This video game level editor fails Wikipedia's general notability guideline.
It was contested by czarkoff (talk · contribs) on 2012-08-08 with the comment:
Contested PROD: see talk page for rationale

Video games

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

view
watch
edit
history
shell
vg talk
alerts
purge

AfDs

Rewired (demoparty) (0 participants)
Grossology (books) (4 participants)
Studio Yotta (1 participant)
Vicious Engine (3 participants)
Jack Marston (Red Dead) (6 participants)
Joshua Tomar (6 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Wording confusion[edit]

"EULA forbade the whole package's use for non-commercial projects difficult, and thus made development of open-source additions difficult."

I'm not sure how to correct this, since I don't know what it's supposed to mean... ~ Booyabazooka

Changed it, I think it sounds better.... --niteice^talk2me 15:15, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is what you get when I don't get enough coffee. =) =( The actual EULA clause:

2. Prohibitions. You, whether directly or indirectly, shall not do any of the following acts: ...

e. in any other manner and through any medium whatsoever commercially exploit the Software or use the Software for any commercial purpose;

So what I meant that it was meant for, essentially, non-commercial Q3A projects only. Duh. Thousand times sorry! I'll be a Good Citizen and drink my coffee and read three times what I've written to make sure it makes sense. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox[edit]

I made a userbox for myself... which is looks like this:

This user is a level designer using GtkRadiant

it can be used by using {{User GtkRadiant}} somewhere ;)Yzmo ^talk 20:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Open Arena also supports it Pelikoira (talk) 07:45, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tremulous-maps can be also generated with it, see This Tremulous Mapping-wiki.

Merge proposal ZeroRadiant (original page created by Szico VII)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The result was merge into GtkRadiant. -- DanielPharos (talk) 14:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ZeroRadiant basically is GtkRadiant 1.6.0, as stated in its article. So it should be merged into the main GtkRadiant article, possibly into a new section. DanielPharos (talk) 15:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree should be a new section in the gtkradiant article --Darth NormaN (talk) 15:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Free screenshots?[edit]

I was going to restore the old screenshot, but the replaceability clause of NFCC means that we should have a fully open screenshot, because that can be theoretically be done. The software is GPLed, after all, and there are fully GPLed (or otherwise Free) id tech-based games out there. Anyone got courage to load up, say, OpenArena maps to this thing? The .map files seem to be in OA SVN... might get around doing just that eventually =) --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 10:45, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contested proposed deletion[edit]

Though I'm not absolutely sure about this project's notability, it seems to receive some notice in books (eg. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]). Though in each particular case the mention might arguably be trivial, I believe this article deserves some discussion. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]