Talk:Gawsworth Old Hall

Gawsworth Old Hall has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 15, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cheshire Mid‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as High-importance).

Historic sites High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment Report

Article needs to be massively expanded.
It should make use of sections.
Photos need to be added.
References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)

DDStretch (talk) 09:33, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Gawsworth Old Hall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review. 10:38, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I've now reviewed the article in depth and found no "defects" that needed to be highlighted here: I've merely added a few wikilinks and added a template to appese the "Metric Police". This, itself, is a reflection of the high quality of the article. Pyrotec (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A comprehensive article.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Well referenced.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Well referenced.

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I'm delighted to award this article GA. Congratulations on producing another fine "Cheshire" article. Pyrotec (talk) 11:36, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Gawsworth Old Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711080217/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/history.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/history.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711080337/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/index.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711080441/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/events.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/events.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711075841/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/the_tea_rooms.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/the_tea_rooms.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711080854/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/weddings.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/weddings.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711081229/http://www.gawsworthhall.com/open-air-theatre.html to http://www.gawsworthhall.com/open-air-theatre.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]