Talk:Frenemies (podcast)

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2021. The result of the discussion was redirect.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

YouTube Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

edit
history
watch
purge

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Podcasting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Too much gossip and Twitter sourcing[edit]

This reads like it should be in a gossip magazine, not an encyclopedia. What would the article look like with strict high-quality RS sourcing, and without swathes of primary sourcing to tweets? - David Gerard (talk) 10:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought information sourced via tweet was allowed under stringent guidelines which this seems to fit. As far as reading like it should be in a gossip magazine, I’m not exactly sure what you mean by that, I tried to source solely factual neutral information that I could cite via credible sources. Please feel free to let me know what changes you think should be made and what areas you specifically are concerned about Kdog5454 (talk) 07:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I should also add, the twitter sourcing is for tweets that were linked in articles, I provided the tweets only when using direct quotes from them. Kdog5454 (talk) 07:05, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was never a standalone podcast[edit]

Pinging substantial recent contributors Kdog5454, Ssilvers, and LaVozSA with the question: Why was this article recreated? The resolution of the 2021 RfD discussion was, from my vantage point, the only sensible one, especially given the amorphous nature of what's produced at H3h3Productions. As referenced in the title, this article is factually inaccurate in claiming that this was its own podcast using the criteria developed by WikiProject Podcasts at Wikidata (wd:WPP), the primus inter pares of which being the existence of a distinct Atom/RSS web feed document enumerating the episodes. I searched high and low after pulling this entry off the top of the workstack at wd:WPP, and every single source I found from Apple Podcasts to Podcast Index to Podnews and even Google agreed that this was a limited thematic series of episodes for the ersatz H3 Podcast, which can be easily verified by examining its canonical feed document, specifically lines 7,803–10,799 as of this writing (they will naturally shift lower with each new episode published).

Of course I'm always open to reviewing other sources if someone has them, so please cite them here if you know of any. You couldn't hope to understand how personally abhorrent I find deletionism to be; this would only be the second or third one I'd felt compelled to initiate in over two decades of contributing here, but that's honestly where I'm at with this one based on the information in hand. This should be a section on the H3 Podcast article, full stop. — ℛogueScholar ₨🗩 00:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. I agree with Redirect. -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]