Talk:FreeCol

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Java Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Java, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Java on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JavaWikipedia:WikiProject JavaTemplate:WikiProject JavaJava articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

view
watch
edit
history
shell
vg talk
alerts
purge

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Speedy Deletion

This is a fairly popluar game with 17,000 hits in Google. Kc4 21:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a few styleistic edits and removed plagerised material. Kc4 21:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Development Information

Is it within the scope of the Wikipedia article to discuss the development of the game? Information on this could be found on the game's website and from the project of the month article. 193.157.182.115 13:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same thing, and including information on how the game differs or improves on the original Colonization. Ianboggs 04:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-Good idea! 193.157.188.13 13:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FreeCol 0.11.0 released

http://www.freecol.org/news/freecol-0.11.0-released.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anttipng (talk • contribs) 19:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

Inspired by the wpde article, I added some criticism to this article. Whoever disagrees should read Zinn. User:ScotXW^t@lk 16:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't criticism sections be used to refer to existing criticism, and not simply add an arbitrary novel critique? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.158.218 (talk • contribs)

Yes, they should. Removed it. The dewiki example is equally problematic, using sources that discussion Civ IV to comment on FreeCol. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 17:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not a manual

FreeCol has a rather decent manual, and it's covered by the civilization wikia to some degree (+libregamewiki). Can we please get rid of some details here as suggested by Qwertyus in this diff? –Be..anyone 💩 05:38, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]