Talk:Fort Andross/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: UnidentifiedX (talk · contribs) 11:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will be reviewing this article. You can read the history log to see if I have made any improvements to the article. If there are large mistakes that require more attention, you will be notified. You can track the assessments’ progress in the following table:

Notified

The nominator has been notified of the ongoing review.

Assessment

Comprehension:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	After reading the article and making minor corrections, I am happy to pass 1a and 1b.	Pass
(b) (MoS)		Pass

Verifiability:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The article is well referenced ~~with the exception of the lead~~	Pass
(c) (original research)	The article does not contain any original research	Pass
(d) (copyvio and plagiarism)	You can view the report here	Pass

Comprehensiveness:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	Happy to pass both.	Pass
(b) (focused)		Pass

Neutrality:

Notes	Result
The article represents viewpoints fairly and without bias. Happy to pass.	Pass

Stability:

Notes	Result
There is no ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Pass

Illustration:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	The reviewer has left no comments here	Pass

Comments

Thank you for reviewing the edits I made to your article. I am happy to pass the article based on the 6 GA requirements. Thanks for your patience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by UnidentifiedX (talk • contribs) 14:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]