Talk:Fly Angola

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fly Angola article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: not checked

This article is supported by the airline project.

Africa: Angola Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Angola.

This article was nominated for merging with List of Fly Angola destinations on 9 June 2020. The result of the discussion was Merged.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Destinations[edit]

MERGE

There is no more need to keep this discussion and let it rot, while it makes sense to merge. Gerald WL 07:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

With Just four destinations there is no need for a dedicated page for them. Apart from that the main article is also not too detailed. Hence, the proposal to merge. For me its WP:NOPAGE. Bingobro (Chat) 10:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd agree - there's no point in duplication and the destination list is small enough that it doesn't bulk out the main article too much. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 17:07, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's better to end this discussion and merge it. It has been put here, so there's no need to have separate article anymore. Gerald WL 17:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.