Talk:Experimental hip hop
Appearance
This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Alternative hip-hop Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Alternative hip-hop |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
[edit]On what freaking planet can the Gorillaz be classified as "experimental" anything? They're damn good, but be serious - Stockhausen this isn't. This page should be deleted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.243.77 (talk) 11:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
there's only one source (look at references)
[edit]--82.139.5.13 (talk) 18:43, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
how is mac miller and cudi experimental?
[edit]these guys are pop to the max. there is experimental elements, but even yeezus is more experimental — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.64.90.239 (talk) 06:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
cosign!!
[edit]signed by me...
and no mention of antipop
[edit]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e84LOYFbf3o
--https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=il92krFwM-o
--I mean, you're listening to the wrong mac.70.170.85.35 (talk) 07:22, 4 April 2015 (UTC)