Jump to content

Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 1984/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Sims2aholic8 (talk · contribs) 16:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

You deserve yet another review for this one! --K. Peake 09:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Frank Naef's role needs to be sourced in the body for him to appear in the infobox
  • Lead looks good!

Location

[edit]
  • "the contest, and eventually" → "the contest and eventually"
  • Remove the "tickets were not sold to the general public" part so the info after as a result starts at "only press..." since the tickets are not mentioned by the source and no public tickets is implied by this anyway

Participating countries

[edit]
  • "of nineteen countries participated" → "of 19 countries participated" per MOS:NUM
  • I think coincided would be more suitable for Wiki language than clashed here
  • Img and second para look good!
  • Jacques Zegers should not be wikilinked a second time under songwriters
  • I don't think you should wikilink Søren Bundgaard when this leads to Hot Eyes for a second time
  • Franco Battiato should not be wikilinked a second time under songwriters
  • Giusto Pio should not be wikilinked a second time under conductor

Production and format

[edit]
  • First two paras look good!
  • "of eleven individuals," → "of 11 individuals," per MOS:NUM
  • "30 April and 1 May," → "30 April and 1 May 1984,"
  • "focussed on the various" → "focused on the various"

Contest overview

[edit]
  • "which gave Sweden its second" → "which performed Sweden's second" on the img text to be clearer
  • "as of 2024" should be moved to coming after the part saying she was the youngest individual to host the contest
  • "and went on to present the contest in" → "and she presented in" to be specific because otherwise it reads as if you are talking about a later contest
  • "the United Kingdom's entry." → "the UK's entry."
  • Remove wikilink on Belle and the Devotions
  • Remove wikilink on Louis Herrey since this is a redirect to the Herreys
  • Table looks good!

Spokespersons

[edit]
  • Good

Detailed voting results

[edit]
  • All good!

Broadcasts

[edit]
  • The first two sentences are not fully sourced nor is the relay information about the artists and songs part
  • Shouldn't the table refs be centred?

Notes

[edit]
  • I don't think CEST should be wikilinked twice

References

[edit]
  • Copyvio score looks incredible at 8.3%!!!
  • I am confused regarding the lack of consistency with ref linking again; on some instances, you adhere to linking to the same sources again but on some you follow WP:OVERLINK and either one needs to be consistent
  • Wikilink Telos Publishing on ref 2
  • Remove www.eurovision.de from refs 8 and 15
  • I have my doubts about the reliability of Vorm van vermaak on ref 26 since it is linked to Wordpress
  • Cite RTL Today as publisher instead on ref 29
  • Wikilink Wiwibloggs on ref 30
[edit]
  • Good

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
  •  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; nice work once again! --K. Peake 17:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Kyle Peake: Thanks for another thorough review! I believe I've resolved all the outstanding issues above. Apologies for the ref confusion, I'll be sure to be more consistent on this when nominating articles in future! I've removed ref 26 above, as I understand your doubts on this ref and I am confident the paragraph is properly sourced with the two offline sources listed. Let me know if there's anything else. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Pass now, I did a brief copy edit of the img text but really impressive response from you here! --K. Peake 08:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]