Talk:EnviroMission

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal EnviroMission is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled

Hi. I'm new to Wikipedia and would like to know if I could use this website http://www.solar-geysers-cape-town.co.za/ as a reference. Please can someone give me some advice. Thanks Julian — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julianventer47 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about progress? What progress has been made toward completion of this project? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.2.115.228 (talk)

A lot of hot air. They didn't get a federal government grant, so their AGM included a lot of bluster about how this was better for the project as it removed the constraint of having to fit the terms of the grant.[1] --Scott Davis ^Talk 22:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There was never any possibility of completion of the original Solar Tower Buronga project. Some (not all) of the concepts contradicted the laws of thermodynamics. The main data is from a project (in Spain) several orders of magnitude smaller, which was claimed as a success despite being destroyed by a thunderstorm. The dates and scale of the project have been continually revised to be later and smaller. Andrewa 03:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also Talk:Solar Tower Buronga and if really interested, the page history has some fascinating claims, most if not all of them from the various versions of the EnviroMission website - which of course is not versioned so we can't now verify this. But try this one. (;-> There was also a claim that the temperature differential could be used to drive air-conditioning and thus increase the available electrical power by gathering more heat... we had a little discussion about what the Carnot cycle says about this, which I can't find just now. Andrewa 04:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The latest news at http://www.enviromission.com.au/news/news.htm is now over a year old (6 December 2005). The cracks are appearing. Andrewa 02:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are December 2006 Company announcements on their website, so they're still updating it. I don't recall the air conditioning claim, but a lot of the Carnot cycle discussion is at Talk:Solar updraft tower/Archive 2#Carnot engine. It's also mentioned in Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-07-12 Solar Updraft Tower which never really got finished - we all just got bored and went somewhere else. --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's one way of putting it. I had already put too much time into it, and there was more important stuff going on that required my attention. Now it appears that things have moved on, EnviroMission lost out on a $A75 million ($US57 million) Australian federal government grant to Solar Systems, a competing Melbourne solar power company. Perhaps what should be done is reduced that Solar updraft tower dinosaur article to no more than one paragraph, saying that the project is going nowhere. JdH 18:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, they are updating parts of the site. I suppose it's not the only website to have some neglected pages... Andrewa 09:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not like they've actually done much in the last year to announce. --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Energy from hot air?

None of these sustainable energy projects make much economic sense while cheap oil is still a stone's throw away. That may not be the reality, but it's certainly the perception for many. Not everyone is convinced that cheap oil won't return. Too much uncertainty with the future is probably the reason we don't see things like this taking off right away. Landroo 19:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As of July 2014 Enviromission is still ongoing in their attempts to commercialise the Solar Updraft Tower idea and have sold the rights to build towers to a Texan group and and are in ongoing discussions with a Middle Eastern investor and likewise in India. After the SCPPA solar tower was aborted (although it may be re-started in some form to the best of my knowledge) I think there was a shift away from owning and operating a tower towards licensing the idea to other developers in return for a share in the equity of each project. Enviromission is listed on the Australian stock market (EVM) and also on the OTC (Pink Sheets) market in the US as EVOMY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.25.181 (talk) 23:23, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on EnviroMission. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120110182017/http://www.ecoseed.org/business-article-list/article/1-business/10705-hensel-phelp-enviromission-build-200-mw-solar-updraft-tower to http://www.ecoseed.org/business-article-list/article/1-business/10705-hensel-phelp-enviromission-build-200-mw-solar-updraft-tower
Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/2007/02/australian_sola.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.business2.com/greenwombat/2006/10/whats_next_for_.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070211090406/http://www.greenhouse.gov.au:80/demonstrationfund/ to http://www.greenhouse.gov.au/demonstrationfund/#roundone

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]