Talk:Doalnara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Doalnara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reads like a flyer[edit]

This article reads less like an encyclopedic article and more like a pamphlet handed to you on the street. Phrases like "A society of people who follow Heaven’s Providence [with unchanging heart and character as firm as stone] forms Doalnara" and "Doalnara eats a diet of saints, a natural diet, crucial in that a “Healthy diet = Healthy body = Healthy mind.”" are very out-of-place.

SomeKindOfGnome (talk) 17:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I'm tempted to use stronger language and say this sounds like a cult, but in the interest of objectivity I'll merely second the above sentiment and say this article reads like an advertisement written by the group and not an objective article. However I am also having great difficulty in finding anything on this group that doesn't read exactly like this and come from a fishy source. Not sure how to clear up this issue without any independent sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.133.96.49 (talk) 16:41, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the only way to make an actually decent article out of this is to use Korean-language sources, unfortunately. SomeKindOfGnome (talk) 01:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]