Talk:Daniel Jolliffe
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Sources exist on Newspapers.com
[edit]Numerous news sources exist on Newspapers.com that could be added to the article. [1]. Netherzone (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Spelling
[edit]@Curiocurio: @John of Reading: So you are saying that the Gage Dictionary is at odds with this piece from the Canadian Government? Please share the entry within the mentioned Dictionary. Neils51 (talk) 01:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- The dictionary says humourless or humorless, both are acceptable. I would say this whole discussion is humourless. Curiocurio (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
- And in what way does the dictionary disagree with the CA government's spelling of humorously? Neils51 (talk) 02:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Curiocurio:, looking forward to your response. Neils51 (talk) 00:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- As I've already said, both humourless (which is the first option in the dictionary) and humorless are acceptable spellings for Canadians. Curiocurio (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Curiocurio:, please focus on the spelling that you reverted which is of humorously. Neils51 (talk) 10:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- As I've already said, both humourless (which is the first option in the dictionary) and humorless are acceptable spellings for Canadians. Curiocurio (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)