Talk:Crowdrise
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crowdrise article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 August 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]yes the article was not of encyclopedic quality and language yet, but i was about to do all that when an administrator stepped in after 10mins and deleted it all!
Nonchablunt (talk) 17:19, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
i hereby request that the admin in question send me the article he deleted so i don't have to start from scratch!!! 17:08, 16 May 2010 Acroterion (talk | contribs) deleted "Crowdrise" (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) Nonchablunt (talk) 17:23, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
i know that the deletion of this article has not been requested - but it has happened before without any chances to make improvements by a overzealous administrator by the name of acroterion. i wasn't even able to restore older versions but had to START FROM SCRATCH. again thank you very much for spitting into my soup acroterion.
Nonchablunt (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Yes, so many editors and admins are quick on the "unencyclopedic" trigger and don't give artices a chance to grow. It seems they think that "encyclopedic" means "long." Rather than fix the article according to whatever they see wrong, it's deleted. I had an article dubbed a "stub" a few years back, not much information was available on the subject so it was short, and it lasted about 4 months before it was deleted. A recent issue of Time magazine had a half page illustration and several lines in the article devoted to the same "unencyclopedic" subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.77.120 (talk) 15:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Infobox Issues
[edit]I went to add the company's slogan to the infobox, only to see that it is already there in the source code. Why is it invisible in the actual article? Can someone please repair the infobox? Thanks! Steevven1 (Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery) 03:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Websites articles
- Unknown-importance Websites articles
- Stub-Class Websites articles of Unknown-importance
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles